The wonderful thing about parties and social intercourse is that it can be see from so many viewpoints. Truly an elephant that is worth taking a stroll around.
Some of the more unexpected perspectives is seeing a party as a flight, complete with turbulence, difficult landing and even terrorists.
Today’s view is also less than usual. We will take a look at parties from the vantage point of the theory of Gunas in yoga philosophy. I am no expert in Yoga but will write from my current understanding.
There are three Gunas, so the model goes. Sattva stands for clarity, light, being. Rajas is action, energy, activity. Tamas is passivity and heaviness.
In a way this is the classic trinity Be, Do, Have. Thinking in these terms can help us to throw, as we say, a good, better and even great party.
Let us start from the bottom, with Tamas. This is the heaviest and slowest mode. Where do we find Tamas in parties?
Some examples: after a heavy meal with much food and drink we usually go into Tamas mode (all energy goes into digesting). Alcohol can initially raise our Rajas level (we get very “social”, as we drink more we move into Tamas, and finally we lie motionless on the floor.
Tamas can also occur without food and drink, typically in the slow, shy, dull party, with long, embarrassing silences.
Rajas is energy and wild, noisy parties are full of Rajas. It is sometimes a case of activity for activity’s sake, which can be dull.
For some people, lots of booze, music, guests and lots noise equals “good party”, even though is is only a “much” — a quantity rather than quality party.
Of course Rajas is needed to shake the dull party out of slumber and remove its spider web. A sub-optimal occurrence is when an over-active, ants in the pants-host tries to “activate” guests that are already active (thank you) with contrived games and the wrong kind of party silliness.
Not really necessary. Not that there is anything wrong with games. On the contrary. But plan intelligently; don’t contrive.
So far, this is nothing strange: we are talking about activity and passivity. Where does Sattva enter then?
Sattva obviously is not Tamas; what is light cannot be heavy. Sattva is awake, alive, vibrant. But – is doesn’t feel a need to do, to act, to jump about and tell jokes. It CAN do all that, if it feels right, but really there is no duty or compulsion in Sattva. As Annie sang, Sattva is about Doin’ What Comes Natur’lly.
Sattva means to accept what is, and of course at a party a party is what is. We are not sitting on a mountaintop, meditating in silence. We are interested in the other guests, conversation flows without hindrances, we are laughing, but there is none of the almost addictive nature or Rajas (”We must DO something!!”) .
At a Sattvic party people will do things anyway, not because they MUST or because they have ants in their pants and think that Action equals Fun. Things are done because there is a spontaneous, positive inclination.
At my own parties I try to steer away from both too much Tamas and Rajas towards balanced Sattva. For example, I never have a lot of food, which leads to “paltkoma”, heaviness which makes us unable other aspects of a party. (I wrote about this in an earlier epistle.)
Another kind of Tamas to avoid is the boring kind and, yes, silence can kill. At my Swedish parties I always start with a punch, to loosen the spirits and tongues. We want to move away from the graveyard atmosphere of Tamas as soon as possible.
Rajas can be a very good in the right place and proportion. Conversation, interesting people and preferably some kind of program that stimulates makes our evening memorable. But activity should be inspired and stimulating, not forced.
I love party games and am prepared to push my guests a bit to come out of their shy shells, to release their inner Homo ludens. But this is a sensitive thing, and should be done at the right moment in the right way.
I dislike “quantity parties”, as mentioned above, with lots of people, food, drinks and music. All this dulls the senses and Sattva is just the opposite of this.
Thus, the number of guest in relation to the size of the locale is very important. Too few guests and their will be hollow echoes, too many and nobody can hear what that interesting guest is saying. No numbers can be given, but think about the question of proportion. Aim at harmony between size and number of guests.
Also remember where energy goes. After food it goes to the belly which needs to digest the food. Of course good food means sensual enjoyment, which is festive. The drawback is that it can make people Tamasic, sleepy and passive for a while. If you are partying for ten hours, fine. If you are not you might have a real dip in the party, which I do not like. Rest, relaxed atmosphere, yes, but dips are not necessary. As I have written before, if you put your interesting program (Rajas) after a big meal, it risks falling into the “food-shadow” of Tamas.
So meditate on the drawback of both Tamas (quite obvious) and Rajas (much less obvious and for that reason more important) so that you can break free from both, and move into the light of Sattva and have that rare kind of party that people will remember and talk about for a long time .-)
Today let’s talk about place, space and placement.
The locale is of course important for all parties, not only the refined kind. I am aware that we have different resources. Some of us live in castles, others in grand apartments, still others in small, humble flats.
Some of us can choose where to hold our party, others have only one alternative.
Seen from a wider perspective the place for your party does not much matter — if other factors are satisfying. It is not of prime importance. However, even if all the other factors (guest list, the host (you), the program, etc.) are fantastic, the locale can still add a lot to the evening.
One cannot criticize natural resources, so to say; we live as we live. However, even a very humble flat can be “upgraded” for a party, prepared for festivities.
When I arrive to a party I may note that this is a very simple apartment, but also that the host is generous, has used his imagination well and really created a festive touch. He has made a lot out of almost nothing.
The other extreme is the grandiose flat, but you note that the host couldn’t care less. He thinks that “natural gifts” are enough, so why should he exert himself? Even though his flat is much more impressive than the simple flat, it strikes me as much less festive. The thought, the generosity (and all the resulting consequences) count much more than raw materials.
Irrespective of whether you hold the party at your own place or somewhere else, try to find that festive touch that feels extra-ordinary. Aim for a weekend, not weekday, tone, so that when the guests arrive they sense that this is no ordinary meeting but something different, a party apart.
There are lots of details that can raise the party’s electrical atmosphere. They are too many to recount, but let me speak somewhat about furniture and furnishing.
There are two main roads to take here: sitting or moving about.
Either you are inviting your guests to dinner, sitting at a more or less long table. Food will obviously be an important factor then.
But of course people don’t just sit and eat at a party, they also talk. I often find that even though the food is very good and well taken care of, the talk isn’t. Or I should say, the possibilities for stimulating conversation are not made the most of. Keep in mind that even when the food is only so-so, we well remember an evening with sparklingly stimulating conversation. Good talk counts more than grub (and is more rare).
But how do we create good talk? Not an easy thing. Let’s look at how to avoid creating poor talk, lame conversation, and things will immediately improve.
Let us count. How many people do we have immediate access to at a party where we sit down to eat?
Two to my left and right, and three in front of me. If we are going to sit and eat for perhaps several hours then these five individuals are going to be immensely important to me. Or immensely boring…. Which happens all to often.
If I would hold such a party — which I don’t, because I don’t believe in forcing people to sit in one place for hours — I would not let my guests choose where to sit. We gravitate towards that and those we already know, out of habit and sometimes out of fear (“What if I have nothing to say to those admittedly interesting looking strangers over there? No, I will stick to my old pals!”). Not a festive thing, especially not for those who don’t have any old pals to fall back on.
Consider that at larger parties (20 guests or more) there are usually always a couple of lost, “left-over” people who hardly don’t know anybody at all. And there are perhaps several groups of 2-5 people who know each other almost too well. (I call these groups clumps. They often create small sub-parties within the larger, actual party. More about clumps and sub-parties later.)
What happens to these 4-5 odd folks? They may be lucky and find each other immensely interesting. Then again, they may not. And the fact that others already know each other well can easily dampen their mood and joy.
I don’t want that to happen. Therefore I would compose A Well Thought Out List for the table seating.
Here is a great opportunity for you to let out, and cultivate, your inner matchmaker. Because matchmaking is what this is about. You should have the total guest list in front of you and lay a puzzle, see how you can find preferably five persons for each guest that are interesting TO them, and interested IN them.
That’s some challenge, and it will probably not succeed. But having aimed for the impossible, your party will be so much better than if you had thrown a dice and given the matter just ten paltry minutes.
This can also be a truly fun aspect of pre-party planning. Imagining how A, B, C, D and E will fit in with F trains your imagination and your “host muscles”, which are always concerned with the interaction of diverse human beings.
You might come up with groups that fit each other harmoniously, or adventurously, or bizarrely. That’s fine, we don’t need a totally homogenous whole, that could be boring, even slightly comatose.
An aspect of adventure lightens up the grey terrain of our sometimes dreary lives. Do not be afraid of it. Be more afraid of boredom and connecting people who make each other yawn.
Give time to this preparation; it might be more fun than the party itself! And of course be prepared to change things at the last minute, when your carefully thought out plans meet the reality of guests who cannot come or arrive late.
A good host always lands on his feet, not on his nose. And definitely not on the nose of another!
As I said, I wouldn’t throw this kind of party myself; I prefer to leave more room for my guests. Say that I have 20 people coming over. Even if I can be a perfect matchmaker and create perfect groups of five, I wouldn’t want a guest to be limited to only five people, plus sit the whole evening. Neither would most of my guests.
I believe in the charm and excitement and adventure of meeting new, exotic people, but this also entails leaving people. I might have a great little conversation or chat with someone at a party, but after a while I want more. There are other people that whet my curiosity. At a sitting dinner I would be chained to a chair, but at a more mobile party nothing (expect perhaps misguided “politeness”) stops me from excusing myself and moving on, to the next flower, and to the next.
If I have met and talked with perhaps 15 interesting people at a party, I call that a great evening! (I will probably write an entire epistle about mingling.)
Obviously all this is partly a question of furnishing. Every home can be furnished in different ways and nothing stops you from moving your furniture about. If you lack chairs you can borrow from a neighbor or friend.
As to food, instead of a dinner you could have a buffet. All the food on one table, so that the guests take their plates and help themselves.
This is in a double sense a wise move socially, because during this fetching food-stage one bumps into other people. Other people are in my opinion the very raison d’être of refined party life. And in my book “bumping” is a good thing. When you just sit and sit you don’t bump into no one; no fortunate coincidences, no Lady Luck. The moving about reinforces the adventurous, exciting aspect of the evening.
But of course we don’t want everybody to stand the whole night. I would place smaller tables here and there with perhaps 3-4 chairs around them. Not more.
This will create small islands, but not forts. You can quickly get in, but also get out (which is just as important). When boredom sets in, on you move! Don’t fall into the well of misdirected politeness.
I ask none of my guests to bear boredom; however, I often feel that that is asked of me at parties.
Just say no to boredom is my watchword.
So, create possibilities to rest, sit, eat, but also to move. Let’s be as mobile as our telephones.
A warning is in place here: watch out for the sofa-armchair-trap, the SAT. I call it trap because that’s what it is. The SAT consists of a sofa, usually a low table and a couple of chairs around it. Now imagine the dynamism of this formation.
When the first four guests arrive, guests with not strong enough hedonistic impulses (i.e. willing to give up enjoyment too easily), they sit down in the sofa. The low table kind of shuts them in.
More guests arrive and place themselves on the chairs around the sofa. The prison is set!
What happens in this situation? Here is a likely scenario:
Imagine that you are one of the people sitting in the sofa. With the added newcomers a kind of circle has been formed. Now a circle can be a really dangerous thing. It closes in, and it excludes out. It is hard to enter from outside (for newcomers), and it is hard to exit for those already in. Yes, that sounds like a prison.
You need a good excuse, a too good excuse to leave the sofa now. No excuse should be needed at all.
A circle seems to have a message of its own. It says: “Let’s keep this together folks. Let’s stick together, talk together, think together…”
What a sorry invitation to conformism… Even a half open circle can be bad.
All this CAN be great if we really do think together, but that happens seldom. Often this is just a low bow to the idol of Conformism. Vive la similarité.
A common variation is that 2-3 people (if we are lucky) talk about something that really interests them, while the others get the role of audience. They can of course be “polite” and try to fit into a conversation that, to be honest, bores them. Not good.
But it can be even worse. Those 2-3 people that we THOUGHT were talking about something that really interested them, might be “polite” as well, feigning interest without having it. Now that’s really bad!
Yes, we must admit it: its not always easy to “break the ice” and start a conversation. Often we take the road of least resistance and talk about something that we THINK interests everybody. But what “interests everybody” often interests nobody. And even if it does interest, going the way of least resistance creates the least pleasure — and the most boredom.
By placing that sofa there, that table there and those chairs there, you have almost created an invitation to boredom. Don’t do it.
Open up the whole thing. If you have a sofa, don’t shut it in with a table. Keep the chairs away from it. Create white space, freedom, breathing room. Let your guests be birds, let them fly and don’t fence them in.
As you understand this kind of moving, non-sitting arrangement is better suited for more artistic and even bohemian folks. Bohemians are often used to informal and aleatoric parties where everything just happens. I see a need for a higher bohemian octave. I have tried to describe some aspects of it here.
Much depends on the guest list, of course. We will discuss that important subject at length in another epistle.